Double-spaced, single-column manuscript; at most three heading levels.
Abstract: at most 300 words, without citations.
Move footnotes into the main text or references.
Before submission: add continuous line and page numbers, verify PLOS reference examples, place captions/tables after first mention, and upload figures separately. This preset applies draft spacing and checks only; font and margin values are your choices.
Abstract: at most 200 words, unstructured, without references or figures.
Use up to six keywords; title guidance: at most 20 words.
At initial submission, figures can be embedded or provided separately.
Before submission: apply and verify Nature reference formatting, review the submission checklist, author/contact information, declarations and data availability. This preset checks draft content; it does not change your citation style or claim complete journal formatting.
01
HHeading
Introduction
02
¶Paragraph
Academic writing tools often force authors to choose between visual simplicity and typographic control. This report explores a structured approach in which content remains easy to arrange while LaTeX handles the final composition.
03
!Callout
Research question: can a block editor preserve academic structure without asking the author to manage LaTeX syntax?
04
HHeading
Method
05
•List
Observe common academic writing tasks Model each task as a typed block Generate a deterministic LaTeX document Validate the rendered sequence
06
∑Equation
Typeset previewUpdates as you type
Q=S×C×R
Document quality as a function of structure, consistency, and review
07
HHeading
Initial observations
08
▦Table
Final table previewDirectly editable
Click any cell to edit
Table. Comparison of common authoring workflows
Separate cells with | and rows with a new line.
09
¶Paragraph
The structured workflow reduces the number of formatting decisions made during drafting. Authors remain responsible for meaning and evidence, while the template controls presentation.
